I received a disturbing email on the life of an ETA on hunger strike. I put the text to appreciate the personal quality of "Anonymous" who wrote:
"Have if you're lucky and opened a bottle of champagne;Now my opinion on this blessed text:
CHAIN \u200b\u200bTHIS IS THE BEST I HAVE SEEN. .. must continue.
De Juana Chaos Announces a new strike hunger in anticipation of his conviction threats.
The ETA Jose Ignacio de Juana Chaos has announced through his lawyer and others around it returns to the hunger strike after the information from the media about the sentence that will be imposed for terrorist threats.
De Juana Chaos is in custody after being indicted in August 2005, the month in which extinguished the sentence imposed for his involvement in 11 bombings that killed 25 people.
Please, this is a string that sole purpose, is to see if I get one of those who give them food so they do not provide or honey, or Jamoncito and if possible, not a drop more water or consecrated hosts, for this son of a bitch.
to see how he feels his family to see that all offers with champaigne Spain, (as he did for the victims of this terrorist group), when I die.
Please, if you're one of the guards cell, please think about what you have traveled this mail to reach your eyes.
wanted it not strike? : Well, take strike!
Do not for us, for those twenty-five people who can not go to dinner with their children, wives, parents, who can not go to the movies, who can not decide freely their thoughts. ..
This son of a bitch, killed 25 people in their day ...
Support the campaign:
! NO MORE FOOD FOR THE TERRORIST Bastard!
What is a string that you'll quickly forward, eh?:
PASS. FOR A GOOD CAUSE. "
<------------>
The text can read it here. Its title is "THIS IS THE BEST I HAVE SEEN THAT CHAIN \u200b\u200b...". Letting die advocates that gentleman (well he calls Hi ..), speaks of "humanities" and hate not stopped. Look, I think we are far anthropologically of lizards and I get it wrong, some remind me that our reptilian brain keeps sending a lot in the fate of human beings, even over the wonderful cerebral cortex. And I reflect: Is reptilian brain in charge in these gentlemen?, And being that part which governs the basic instincts of survival, such as sexual desire, the search for food, and aggressive responses such 'fight-or-flight'. When do use the cerebral cortex?. Do they make love more than others?. Are fatter? Or are fighting, fleeing all the time?
Now, more seriously will reason:
for the message called PASS (serious as yours), to continue the chain, with some thoughts that can only be expressed from the freedom and common sense. We add a few things experts say. I hope nobody is offended, confused or misunderstood. In any case, I hope that at least review the statements which I have received text "THIS IS THE BEST I HAVE SEEN THAT CHAIN \u200b\u200b..." for long after that does not provide or honey, or Jamoncito and if you can being, not a drop more ... And human beings want to escribeeste mail:
"champaigne toasts throughout Spain ... when I die."
could give a lot of reasons not to agree with those painful desires, but give better than the experts. I'll start from psychiatry, for example with Luis Rojas Marcos, entitled "
NEW WORLD BALANCE OF PSYCHOLOGY" read full here
" Another component of the new psychological equilibrium is the insatiable thirst for revenge. The war in Afghanistan illustrates dramatically this aspect. Revenge is an eminently human feeling that has the intensity of passion, the strength of an instinct and the compulsion of a reflection. Throughout our history, millions of men and women have satisfied their desires for justice by charging violently with pleasure to the wicked. The book of Exodus equation summarizes the proverbial "life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound." And says the Book of Psalms, "The righteous will rejoice when
wash their feet in the blood of the murderers.
experience Today a fever of revenge that has relegated the concept of forgiveness into oblivion. We are willing to pay any price as long as taking the life of the guilty. Kill the criminal is considered the ultimate act of redemption, as the aggressor irreversibly terminates, cancels his debt to society and magically cancels the offense.
However, any costs to pursue the annihilation of those who break our lives binds us all to a string of endless violence and dehumanizes us, it forces us to adopt the same tactics as the executioners. The developed nations retaliate against their enemies are often represented on TV in an environment of supersonic missiles and smart bombs that are complicated logistics and achieve precise impacts
distant and impersonal targets. The reality, however, is that when we turn away from television lens, so biased and misleading, they are filled it out on violent cruelty, innocent victims of senseless destruction. "
Searching Wikipedia for the word "I hate " I get this sentence:
" Hate is often a prelude to violence. Before the war, it often helps teach people to hate another nation or regime political. Hatred is still the main motive behind armed conflicts such as war and terrorism. It is not easy to know when hate has a logical basis and when
hatred has become counterproductive self-perpetuating. "
Delving into the hatred, I have found another page that talks about the psychology relationships of Brotherly Love, Love, passion, hate and aversion. Written by Alberto E. Fresina, is called THE LAW OF THE PSYCHE. can read it here. Of how much he has them put out a statement:
" Within the world of motivational elements that make the apparatus, are highlighted with great relevance
impulses of joy and conservation. The joy is responsible for the desire for happiness and achievement of all the ideals that lead to it, since the conditions of happiness are those that ensure the abundance of material pleasure, moral and spiritual. The imp. conservation, meanwhile, is responding with fear to the conditions of unhappiness. Therefore, always avoid negative virtual values, or "anti-ideals, which are sources of displeasure safe material, moral or spiritual."
also found an interview with Lou Marinoff in the newspaper El Mundo, and put this bit:
" 5. How philosophers teach us how to manage the passions? Can we achieve a balance between what is desired and what is appropriate?
Yes we can. But we must express our emotions in a constructive manner. And we can always express the way that does not harm others. Not all emotions can be expressed constructively. For instance, love each other, but hate or greed or envy can not be expressed in a constructive and these types of emotions must be transformed, because if we can hurt ourselves and others. "
Another important perspective is provided by the International Committee of the Red Cross with your item (here )
entitled Mobilizing hate mobilize solidarity: "social identity as the basis for mass communication" , sack them a bit:
" The difference between the hate-mongers and advocates of solidarity not only with interpretations that use, but also how to justify those interpretations. It may be a distinction between democratic discourse, which makes explicit the basis on which proposals are linked to the identities and thereby open the space for debate and alternatives autocratic and discourse, which assumes the link and thus excludes the debate. In the extreme, the speaker presents himself (or, more rarely, herself), not merely as a representative of the category (among others) but as the living embodiment of the category, an avatar of the essence collective.
The closing speech delivered by Rudolf Hess at the party rally held in Nuremberg in 1934, which stated that "Hitler is Germany just as Germany is Hitler" is just one of many examples. In such cases, everything you say he is, by definition, an expression of group identity, and anyone who opposes the speaker is, by definition, attacking the category. The debate becomes
treason, which guarantees the autocracy. "
Now it is the religious sense (I'm not a believer), because that belief in God and wish evil to others, is against the scriptures, and teachings that our parents gave us, if we forget the ubiquitous Sermon on the Mount of Jesus Christ with his forgiveness for the enemies that says
" 38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye tooth for a tooth.
39 But I say: Do not resist an evil person but whoever slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also
40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your coat also
41 and whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him twain. 42
Whoever asks of you, and whoever wants to borrow from you, do not turn away. 43
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you;
45 That ye may be sons of your Father in heaven, who makes his sun rise on the evil and good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? Do not even publicans the same as the
?
47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more? Do not even so?
48 Be ye therefore perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect. "
For human as Marcos Rojas qualifies as" poisons of happiness "and he listed:
pain , fear, anger and depression. And the Divine as the holy Mother Church, we must forgive others ...
Now
TO PROMOTE THE CHAIN \u200b\u200bOF HATE and continue to suffer ...
Cheers and
GIVE LIFE TWICE what they want.
PD. I will return to items welcome. But hatred, and bestiality should be answered promptly and respect for human beings ... ALL HUMANS . Even those who have not earned the right to be respected as people, and have chosen the path of terror. We educating for peace and not violence.
